The rules live everywhere
Payer manuals, state guidelines, old denial letters, a senior reviewer's memory. The document is held to a standard nobody can see in full.
Upload a finished assessment and ABA Stack reads it against the payer's own rulebook. Every issue gets a severity, a pin on the exact spot of the page, and a concrete fix. Fix it, re-run free, submit clean.
HIPAA-ready workflow AI runs under a BAA Role-based access
The ABA Stack review screen. A findings rail lists three findings for an initial assessment: high, baseline data does not establish medical necessity; medium, goal lacks a measurable mastery criterion; low, caregiver training frequency not stated. Beside it, the assessment PDF shows each finding highlighted at its exact location.
Finished assessment, state and payer rulebook, findings pinned to the page, fix and re-run free, submit clean.
This is the story of one assessment: written by a great BCBA, reviewed by a busy team, and submitted to a payer that reads it against rules nobody has in one place.
Payer manuals, state guidelines, old denial letters, a senior reviewer's memory. The document is held to a standard nobody can see in full.
Your most senior clinicians spend their best hours proofreading for omissions instead of coaching the team and seeing clients.
The same report passes one review and comes back covered in edits from the next. Without a shared standard, quality is a coin flip.
ABA Stack turns that scattered institutional knowledge into one repeatable quality gate.
See the reviewNo review catches everything on day one. What matters is that a denial never teaches you the same lesson twice.
Record what the payer flagged, attach the letter, and capture the guidance they gave.
A focused re-review reads the document again, aimed squarely at what the payer called out.
This client's prior denials and payer guidance become part of the context for every audit after that.
Reauthorization denied for insufficient progress data on two goals.
Remembered on every reviewReviewer notes from the payer: graph each goal against its baseline.
Checked before anything shipsWhat this payer flagged once gets caught for every client, before submission.
Caught early next timePayer rules are not national, so ABA Stack does not treat them that way. Every review is specific to the client's state, payer, and plan.
One review standard, four very different mornings.
photo slot: team-wall
Your caseload only, by design. Findings arrive pinned and explained, so the vague "double-check everything" task becomes a checklist.
Review what the AI and the BCBA already resolved, add your own findings right on the page, and sign off without being the bottleneck.
Log denials, attach payer letters, track dispositions and resubmissions in one place, even if your billing team is external.
Credits, team, and the status of every assessment in flight. Pay per authorization, not per seat.
Clinical documents deserve safeguards that are always on. These are defaults, not settings your team has to remember to turn on.
Reviews run on enterprise cloud infrastructure under a Business Associate Agreement. Outside that coverage, a review does not run at all.
Documents and client data are encrypted in transit and at rest.
Access is role-based, and BCBAs see only the clients on their own caseload.
Idle sessions sign out automatically after 45 minutes, so an open laptop is not an open record.
Questions about security or the BAA: hello@abastack.ai
Something else on your mind? Write to hello@abastack.ai.
Initial assessments and reauthorization renewals, submitted as PDFs. You upload the document you already prepare; there is no new report builder to learn.
Documentation completeness, medical necessity linkage, measurable goals and baselines, and the payer-specific requirements for the client's state and plan. Your organization can add its own requirements on top.
No. The AI surfaces findings with severities and suggested fixes. The BCBA decides what each one means, can dismiss anything that does not apply, and an admin gives the final sign-off before submission.
Per authorization, not per seat. One credit covers an initial or a renewal, including every re-run on that document until it comes back clean.
Reviews run on BAA-covered enterprise cloud infrastructure and never outside it. Data is encrypted in transit and at rest, access is role-based and limited to each person's caseload, and idle sessions sign out automatically.
photo slot: cta-clinic
Request access and watch ABA Stack review one of your assessments, scoped to your payer, with every finding pinned to the page.